The Three Things Volunteer Board Directors Get Wrong in Their First Year
Most committee members do not fail because they stop caring.
They fail because nobody told them what the role actually required, so they kept doing what they had always done, making assumptions that seemed reasonable at the time and gradually drifting into patterns that undermine the organisation without anyone quite realising it.
The three mistakes below are not rare edge cases. They are the patterns CPRG’s consultants see consistently when working with clubs and associations across Australia. They show up in small clubs and large ones, in well-resourced organisations and struggling ones, in committees full of experienced people and committees made up almost entirely of first-timers.
They are also, importantly, correctable. But only once you can see them clearly.
Mistake one: continuing to do the job you had before
This is the most common mistake and it is also the most understandable one.
You spent three years as registrar. You know exactly how the registration system works, where the problems are and how to fix them. Now you are on the committee, and you can see those same problems playing out. The obvious thing to do is to step in and sort it out.
The problem is that stepping in is no longer your job.
When you join a management committee, your role shifts from delivery to governance. You are now responsible for setting the direction of the organisation, ensuring the right systems and people are in place to deliver on that direction and holding those people accountable. The doing belongs to the operational volunteers and staff. The deciding and overseeing belongs to the committee.
When committee members continue operating in their previous role, several things go wrong simultaneously. The person who now holds the operational role becomes confused about their authority. The committee loses a governance voice because one of its members is distracted by operational detail. And the organisation ends up with a blurred accountability structure where nobody is quite sure who is responsible for what.
The practical fix is to ask yourself, before any action, whether you are about to make a decision or do a task. If it is a task, it almost certainly belongs to someone else. Your job is to ensure that someone is doing it, not to do it yourself.
This distinction between governance and operations is one of the most important concepts in effective club management. A committee that understands it can focus on the decisions, oversight and support that help the organisation move forward. It also helps prevent capable volunteers from taking on too much, becoming overwhelmed and burning out. You do not need to do everything yourself to make a valuable contribution to the club.
Mistake two: not declaring a conflict of interest
Most committee members who fail to declare conflicts of interest are not trying to hide anything. They simply do not recognise the situation as a conflict, or they assume that because their interest is indirect, it does not need to be disclosed.
Both assumptions are wrong.
Under the legislation governing incorporated associations across Australia, including the Associations Incorporation Act 1981 in Queensland, committee members have a duty to disclose and manage material personal interests. A conflict of interest arises when a committee member has an opportunity to use their position, or information they hold because of their position, for personal gain or the personal benefit of someone connected to them.
The examples are more common than most people realise.
A committee member’s partner runs a catering business. The club needs to engage a caterer for an event. The committee member participates in the discussion and the vote without disclosing the connection.
A committee member’s child is being considered for a paid coaching role at the club. The committee member is present when the appointment is discussed and does not leave the room.
A committee member is also a director of a company that supplies equipment to the club. A purchasing decision is made at a committee meeting. The committee member votes.
In each of these cases, the committee member may have no intention of acting improperly. But the failure to declare the interest means the rest of the committee cannot manage it, the decision is potentially compromised and the committee member is in breach of their legal duty.
The standard to apply is straightforward. If you have any personal or financial interest in a matter being discussed by the committee, declare it before the discussion begins. The declaration should be noted in the minutes. In Queensland, it should also be entered in a register of declared interests, which is disclosed to members at the AGM. The rest of the committee then determines how to manage the situation, including whether you should leave the room for the discussion and the vote.
Declaring a conflict of interest is not an admission of wrongdoing. It is an act of good governance. Committees that handle conflicts well are stronger for it.
Mistake three: going along with decisions rather than asking the hard questions
This one is harder to talk about, because it involves something more personal than process or procedure.
Many new committee members sit in meetings where decisions are being made without adequate information, where the numbers do not quite add up, or where a course of action feels uncomfortable and they say nothing. They assume that the experienced members around the table must know something they do not. They do not want to look inexperienced. They do not want to slow things down. So they go along.
This is a governance failure, even though it looks like cooperation.
Your duty as a committee member includes the duty to act with care and diligence. That duty is explicitly about asking questions, seeking information and making well-informed decisions. It is not discharged by showing up to meetings and nodding. It requires active, prepared engagement.
This matters for a practical reason beyond the legal one. Committees make bad decisions when they do not have access to the right information, when assumptions go unchallenged and when the people in the room prioritise harmony over rigour. The committee member who asks the question everyone else was too polite to ask is not causing problems. They are doing their job.
In practice, this looks like preparing for meetings before you arrive, reading the reports, asking for clarification when a financial figure does not make sense and pushing back when a decision is being made without adequate evidence. It also looks like speaking up when something makes you feel uncomfortable, which is explicitly part of the diligence duty, not a violation of it.
If you have been in your role for several months and you cannot recall a meeting where you asked a question that changed the course of a discussion, it is worth reflecting on whether you are engaging at the level the role requires.
What connects all three mistakes
Each of these mistakes has the same root cause. The person in the role does not have a clear enough understanding of what committee membership actually requires.
That is not a character failing. It is an information gap and information gaps can be closed.
The Committee Responsibilities Guide produced by CPRG sets out the full scope of committee member duties in plain language, including the legal framework that applies in Queensland. It is a practical reference designed for people who are in the role and want to understand it properly. You can download it here.
If you want to go further, the Bench to Boardroom webinar on Tuesday 28 July addresses all three of these patterns directly. The session is built around the practical skills that help committee members make the transition from doing to governing, including role clarity, meeting behaviours and decision rights. It is free, it runs for approximately 60 minutes and it is designed for the committee member who wants to do the role well.
Missed this webinar? Check what free webinars we have upcoming here.
CPRG works with clubs and community organisations across Australia to build governance capability, clarify strategic direction and develop the leaders who keep organisations strong. Find out more at cprgroup.com.au
